Stop-Obama

with info from Jeff Gold

Finally! Someone with common sense. And the race-baiters are already calling it Racist! It’s “coded for racial stereotypes” [a] it’s already evil, and bigoted, and prejudiced. It’s already too much. And it’s nothing, it says nothing- other than 20 years of Wright- and here is what the Preacher of Hatred spews!

I am not a Republican, no one at Stop Obama is a Republican, but if our own party can let Boz0 the Clown run around the country telling us we cannot discuss 23 years of his allegiance to an unrelenting racist and bigot, who thinks 911 is God’s Wrath upon “White” America - while countless non-whites fell to their death as a result of the terrorist attack- who claims AIDS was designed in a lab to assassinate Blacks, and believes that Blacks are being hounded into concentration camp by a Middle Class America Racist by its very definition, then I see no reason why I cannot endorse a Republican ad which conveys 1/20th of this truth!

Chris Mathews can shove his theories of Racism up his retentive anus. He vomited the “Racist” libel all-over  Clinton’s innocuous 3am ad! Mathews is a paid Whore if one’s ever been seen! His sole life duty to expose Clinton as “race-baiters,” and Obama as the Redeemer. It’s not just double standards, its Race-Baiting by Mathews, pure and simple. Especially in conjunction with yesterday’s announcements by Axelrod himself, that Clinton’s victory in Pennsylvania is attributable to the White Working Vote.

“The white working class has gone to the Republican nominee for many elections, going back even to the Clinton years. This is not new that Democratic candidates don’t rely solely on those votes,” [post]

Race-Baiter!

As our editor Jeff Gold tells me, a look at the Exit Polls shows no such Racial pattern when the numbers are broken down by age and gender. Jeff sees Age as the dominant determinant in this Primary election, bar none. Whites under the age of forty voted equally for Obama and Clinton, and the only drastically “white” vote in favor of Clinton is over the age of 45, and female. Which is a pattern which holds for all ethnicities!

The older you are,  the more pro-Clinton. With the same accuracy that Axelrod insinuates Clinton’s victories to White Racial prejudice, I can freely divulge that The Bamboozler wouldn’t even be in this race if not for the clearly Race driven Black Vote!

Two can play at these stupid games, except only one will be called a race-baiter. He’s got a “free card” this f#$^ing Goebbels! Even though with the “Black” vote, unlike the “White” one, there isn’t even a slight pro-Clinton prejudice except when senior citizenship kicks in at over 65! That’s right, older blacks, over 65, do go 20 to 30 % for Clinton. So let’s talk Racism and Race-Baiting, not forgetting ourselves.

Jeff also tells me, that even questions such as “In deciding your vote for president today, was the race of the candidate…” are meaningless when 19% respond yes, and this percentage split 59% to 41% in Clinton’s favor. Such numbers ignore the racial component in the 19%. Nothing tells us if 89% of these 19% are White or Blacks, and nothing tells us if the 59% who thought race was important for Clinton, voted for or against her! In fact, the numbers could be telling us, that those who voted against Clinton, did so because she was a race-baiter or not the right race!  Or they could simply reveal, that of the 19% who considered race important, if this reflected the 11% portion that Blacks make up in the overall Pennsylvania electorate, we have no idea what portion of the 19% “yes” vote is Black! For all we know, 90% Blacks could have voted for Obama because of race, but this would be entirely diluted by the 88% of non-Black vote composing the 19 %! It would be invisible.

The Media Prostitutes for Obama, always deny and denigrates Clinton’s dominance with Latinos, Asians, Jews, and countless minorities who have consistently given Clinton the advantage over the Lanky, Skanky, Obama Slinky. If anything has held true in this Primary,  its that of all the demographic votes in this election, the White Male Vote has been the most evently split among Skank0 and Clinton, than any other ethnic or “religious” group!

As a working class “Black,” (because Frankly, I am tired of these labels)  I find myself far more attracted to Clinton’s message of hard-work, than Shit0’s inarticulate and ineloquent gibberish about Change! I am sure, most people who join unions, or feed their family from month to month, can share my simpleton sentiment! The word Work does speak to me, the word Change- I think of the loose dimes in my pocket!

With Axelrod spinning Clinton’s Penn victory with Race, and following on the heals of last week’s tough Debate, after which the media Ordained that asking Obama tought questions was a manifestation of latent Racism, I’m seeing stories such as this polluting the internet more and more:

Wape up Call for Obama/Race Card Being Played by Clinton’s

I have to give it to Jeffrey. He accurately predicted that Axelrod would use every opportunity to slam any Clinton victory as a White victory, in order to apply further pressure on voters through a complicit media which will now ratchet up the Guilt Trip Line to the power of N. Jeff first caught sight of this in a post disabusing such rhetoric in Texas and Ohio. Unlike Jeff, I don’t think its an effective strategy to get regular votes, but it is highly effective against undecided Super Delegates - who will get beaten over the head with questions about Race, if they display the slightest pro-Clinton sentiment.

All of which brings me back to that Republican ad from North Carolina, which Bamboozl0’s is already calling problematic. McCain has gone on a limb calling on the NC GOP to drop the ad- and what has HoSama reposted?

“Well, my understanding is that the Republican National Committee and John McCain have both said the ad is inappropriate. I take them at their word. And I assume that if John McCain thinks that it’s an inappropriate ad that he can get them to pull it down since he’s their nominee and standard-bearer.” [bigots]

“I take them at their word”? What’s the suggestion, F@#$0?! That the racist Hate Vomiting Bigot in the video, is not your pastor? That 20 years is not the two decades you’ve initiated him into your family? That your condoning such extremism from Wright, from Farrakhan, from Hamas, from America’s most radical enemies, cannot creatively be called extremism of your own?! Since F#$0 is cleverly referencing McCain, here is what the man who claims to be a Hero, but speaks like a Coward when dealing with Littll’Bama, actually said about the ad:

This ad does not live up to the very high standards we should hold ourselves to in this campaign…We need to not engage in political tactics that only seek to divide the American people…Once again, it is imperative that you withdraw this offensive advertisement.” [bigots]

Who is We Sidney? And what is offenstive? If the truth hurts, you gonna keep it from the folks? And you are for Liberty and democracy?!

McInsane surely cannot be talking about ourselves, odrinary multi-culti AMericans when saying we?! Because its not us at Stop Obama, Clinton, or even you Sir Cain, that is telling God to Damn America, or handing out awards to Racists Doomsdayers like The Odious One (Farrakhan) or publishing Hamas ambassador’s letters. I haven’t seen you or Clinton dividing the American people with Hateful Rhetoric!

So who is we!? And what is Hosama saying, in referencing McCain’s “divisiveness” claim? Is the Fu#$0 endorsing it?

***

For six months now, all I see is a Twanky Debate Dodger, who at every turn smells Race-Baiting and Racism, whose entire message of Change is predicated on Color as in “Color-Change, Cosmetic Make-Over, and Salon Facial”- whose surrogates regularly issue stipulations after stipulation about what voters can and can’t ask about this Faker and his past based, nearly always based on the questioneer’s own race! And McAin is gonna talk about We!? Talk about “me” man. Talk about yourself.

I ain’t no Republican, but I can just see’em lining up to vote for Clinton! From Richard Mellon Scaif, to Bill Cunningham and Anne Couture, hard-core Republicans are going for a woman they hated deeper than the Devil - because their Man (?) can’t stand up to an impudent Extortionist Bamboozler!

Word of advice to Rove and Comp., since you are desperately needing it, if you are wondering why your candidate isn’t making it with your base, maybe you should ask yourself who makes them more comfortable about being who they are? It’s our Woman, not your Man.

The very same woman who still talks about her being a Woman and Obama being an African-American, but has the good sense not to send the message that Anything this Extortionists does, will go unchallenged. The Woman who admits to the importance of both candidates “breaking” barriers (to my annoyance, frankly) still leaves room for the rest of America, to feel Ok about being what it is (i.e. not Bitter, but being who they is).

Not to harp on, not to harp on, because I don’t think the Republicans are my party, nor are they progressive. They wont give me universal healthcare, nor will they give women abortion rights, nor will they knock it off with their stupid Creationism! But still…

Its the head of the Democratic Party in North Carolina that says the new Republican ad is Racist:

“It’s the height of hypocrisy that the NC GOP would start running this racist ad even as John McCain tours African-American communities this week, pretending to be a different brand of Republican politics,” [bigots]

Then goes on to do the Axelrodian two-step:

“While we appreciate Senator McCain’s willingness to keep the campaign on higher ground, he should have acted sooner. [bigots]

Yah, and Axelrod’s White Working Class Fantasies are not Divisive? I recall reading on Fox, that McCain issued the same challange to the Phony - stick to your words- over Phony’s inability to stand up to Jay Rockefeller calling McCain a warmonger. I suppose that’s why McCain finally didn’t hesitate to reference Obama’s Hamas support in a recent memo.

Anyway, if this is the way this campaign is going to progress, when something as simple as this ad,  which is still limited to Youtube (it’s not even in the networks!) is going to become a Divisive Racial issue, then I’ll be bald by August!

First, we couldn’t talk about Wright, because Journalist Whores have small parachutes, and prefer to cower than walk. Second, following a debate which for most American’s amounted to the first Shocking revelation not everything was sweet and clean in the Hussein0 camp (I mean 50 percent are still probably unclear about his middle name), Americans were told we are not allowed to talk about a Candidate’s condoning Hate Speech and practicing Double Standards and Gutter judgement. That the Boz0 has no relevant experience, had no policies prior to January 2008, and is a habitual liar, fluke, and B average student, is also off limits!! Now, finally, when someone - the Republican party of all people- brings up Wright in connection to Obama, bang, bang, bang, its a gangbanger drive-by! Racists in the foot. Racist in the shoulder. Racist in the head.

I wonder, I really wonder, who the real racists are in this pitiful Race? Are the Christopher Matthews, North Carolina Dems, and the Silly McCain’s of this world really so plentiful, so powerful, and so inherently stupid!?

We are talking more than 20 years of HObama’s service, and membership to a man who Preaches Hate, is a first rate America-Basher, and whose words cannot be distinguished from Bin Laden’s (!) and the American people are not allowed to see this run on their television screens!?

The Democratic Primary of 2008, is all about Race and Race-Baiters. What can you expect with a political ghost, experience-not-needed, no significant achievement in my life, pseudo-candidate like Hosama? What’s his asset? What does he bring to Politics, other than his Racial “Change?”

As annoying as Clinton’s “I am a woman” may be, at least she isn’t just a Woman. The overtly sexist treatment she’s been given by the media, has yet to be transformed into “gender baiter” political capital!For me personally, HObama has yet to convince me, he brings anything to the table, but his race.

He is supposed to be articulate, eloquent and bright. People who say this, just might be Racist. They should listened to Clintons’ Pennsyvlania speech, to which, on account of their probably Racism, they will of course not -as the Media doesn’t tell them to- apply such positive adjectives as “bright” and “articulate”. (I do, btw)

If only she were black, then America’s Racist Media would not only call Clinton “bright” they might even remember, that she has 11,000 pages of experience in the White House, while Obama has 0.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS