May 13 2008
The Race-Obsessed Piranha as Segregationist
from SP
My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my “Blackness” than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my White professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. [2]
Intro to Michelle Obama’s “thesis” or the “scribbles of a Race-obsessed arrogant Piranha with a high-school handle on the English language.
Underlying her lachrymal “thesis” - no really, this is Princeton!?- is the radical work of Stokey Carmichael, a Black Supremacist, Racist, and Anti-Semite. Not content with fighting the Racial fight on behalf of the Black Panthers and the National of Islam in the US of KKK, Stokey ran off to Africa, where he changed his name to honor two brutal Dictators, Kwame Nkrumah and Sekou Toure, to become Kwame Toure. His most notable quotes include,
“The only good Zionist is a dead Zionist” and “I have never admired a White man, but the greatest of them was Hitler.” Farrakhan maintains exactly such Rhetoric till this day.
Carmichael’s defining contribution to Black Radicalism in America, was in his vehement opposition to Integration and Assimilation. Having defined American culture as “White” culture, assimilation and integration implied destruction of Black “culture” by a malevolent oppressor. In the words of Barry Turd0-
The minority assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around. Only white culture could be neutral and objective. Only white culture could be nonracial, willing to adopt the occasional exotic into its ranks. Only white culture had individuals. And we, the half-breeds and the college-degreed, take a survey of the situation and think to ourselves, Why should we get lumped in with the losers if we don’t have to? [Dreams from My Father pg. 75]
If Hussein0 privately shares Carmichael’s take on “assimilation,”his “Uncle” regularly “integrates” such views into his Sunday Drivel.
Wright’s Church was among the earliest in America to codify and worship Carmichael’s concept of the American “Middle Class,” being nothing but the “White Class” implying that Blacks becoming “Middle-Class,” meant subjecting themselves to the “foreign culture” of being “White.” Michelle Piranha’s pathetic Princeton “thesis” is based on such, and other of Carmichael’s intellectually decrepit notions. In her own words:
Stokely Carmichael and Charles Hamilton’s (1967) developed definition of separationism in their discussion of Black Power which guided me in the formulation and use of this concept in the study. [8]
Princeton has a lot of owning up to do when it comes to the Piranha’s thesis. First off, the language.
As Christopher Hitchens remarked,
To describe it as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be “read” at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t written in any known language. [hitchens]
To which I would add, with a vocabulary of a high-school drop-out. The profusion of typos? Where was the whiteout? Was Piranha’s adviser asleep at the wheel, or just being “liberal” White?
Second off, Michelle’s recuring factual errors:
Universities such as Princeton only began admitting Blacks in the 1960’s and presently Blacks comprise only about 10% of total enrollment [12]
The 1960’s is blatantly wrong. More like start of the century. Piranha makes this factually wrong observation twice, in her less than 70 pages (some thesis eh?).
Again, where was her adviser? As for the 10% figure, this is pathetic. African-Americans made up about 11 % of the US population in 1985 - at time of her writing. She was a sociology graduate?
Third problem with the “thesis”, is the openly scoffing and unsettling tone. Piranha is open about her Racial sentiment. She writes how upset she is to hear that Blacks who graduate Princeton are more integrationalist than Carmichael’s Black Supremacists. When she presents the argument that integrationalists may be just as concerned with the Plight of Blacks as Black Separatists, she dismisses it out of hand. Integrationalists, Piranha notes, are out of touch with Blacks and their Hopeless reality.
Carmichael’s insistence that American culture was above all “White culture” (again, a take shared by Obama), is revealed when Piranha touches upon Princeton’s “Institutionalized Racism:” Priceton’s curriculum is biased against Blacks, because in keeping with Carmichael, if it is a White university - it teaches White culture.
Piranha quotes a researcher:
“Institutional policies of predominately White universities have established practices which favor the prefered [sic] groups and have ranked priorities which are meant to facilitate the tasks and improve the conditions of White students while ignoring the needs of the Black students”… effects of biased curricula which does not encourage,”…The contribution of Blacks, the study of Blacks, as a group”….negative aspects of social and non-academic activites [sic] at these schools: “Fraternities, sororities, homecoming activities and student government maintain the White status-quo. As in academic areas, the social aspects of university life systematically follow the interests of the White students–the majority group” [13]
Basically, everything Princeton is about, is Racism. Fraternities, homecoming activities, just the White Status Quo. In case readers think Piranha is only summarizing someone else’s position, she assumes her researcher’s observations apply to Princeton, and are true! She cannot elaborate on the “biased curriculum” but nonetheless concludes :
As a result of such biases, both academic and non-academic, it is often difficult for some Black students to adjust to Princeton’s environment; and unfortunately there are very few adequate support groups which provide some form of guidance and counsel for Black students having difficulty making the transition from their home environments to Princeton’s environment. [14]
Part of the argument for bias, has already been mentioned. It has to do with the “small” numbers of Blacks at Princeton in 1985-
Due to the small number of Blacks in attendance, the University does not often meet the social and academic needs of its Black population because these universities focus their attention on accommodating the White students who comprise the majority of their enrollments. [12]
Hm… I didn’t go to Princeton, but my University was 80% White in the early nineties. I never noticed how “biased” my English literature classes were, or history, or mathematics, how lucky I must have been! Judging by Piranha’s thesis, if the Ivy Leagues are so Racist, I really beat the odds-
Predominately White universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the White students comprising the bulk of their enrollments. [58]
No evidence necessary. Racist accusations, have their own way of asserting their truths. Assuming Michelle Piranha’s advisers were regular tenured Princeton professors, what gives? No pride in their institution, let alone factual accuracy?
Yet, shoddy observations are just a tip of the iceberg where the Man-Eating Fish writes, or whines. The aquatic vertebrate only comes into her best in places she “thinks. ” Like in this explanation of why during their years in Princeton, Black students self-segregate:
It is possible that Black individuals either chose to or felt pressured to come together with other Blacks on campus because of the belief that Blacks must join in solidarity to combat a White oppressor. [59]
“Oppressor?” Revealing vocabulary - by “oppressor” does the chordate mean the “White Princeton students” whose “White Princeton Professors” cater to in their Racist pro-White curriculum?
***
Reading Piranha’s garbage, one wonders just what the Civil Right Movement was really about. Martin Luther King, in no uncertain terms made his dislike for the Black Panthers, Black Liberation Theology, and the Nation of Islam, well known.
King did not condone separatism, and condemned Blacks who took to Supremacist extremes. Princeton University clearly has little taste for the Civil Rights Era, and allowed Supremacism right through their doors, and out with a diploma.
Nor is Piranha’s “thesis” just about Affirmative Action run amok, allowing Blacks to underperform the norm, essentially rending any notions of equality and isonomic standards apart. It’s really about a University which can’t even stand up to one of its more radical students, and demand a “thesis” meeting regular Academic standards!
Just read the Pirhana’s Hypothesis! Had I formulated a similarly broad and undefined hypothesis for my Master’s Thesis in College, I’d been shoved out the door! And I did not even attend the “Ivy League.”
***
While Excrement0 rarely mentioned Race in his speeches, and limits his direct Racial appeal to dog-whistle antics, this is logical considering his attempts to reach beyond his Black Base. Since Race is at the essence of his Presidential bid, however, he relies on the proxy of the Civil Rights Era, to communicate a Racial message appealing to Guilt Ridden White Voters.
Yet, just like with Lincoln, voters need to ask, what exactly Zer0’s understanding of the Civil Rights Era, amounts to.
With his own autobiography, his spouse’s “thesis”, and the family’s 23+ years of exposure to Jeremiah Wright’s Black Supremacist Carmichealian Preachings, Hussein’s Civil Rights are about as good as Piranha’s at Princeton’s in 1985.
I am sure a few well placed questions would make this transparent, and someone needs to ask Hussein about “integration” and “assimilation,” or interview Michelle Piranha about Princeton Universities Racist curriculum. As her hero once observed,
I maintain that every civil rights bill in this country was passed for white people, not for black people. …There has been only a civil rights movement, whose tone of voice was adapted to an audience of liberal whites. [black power]
Stoeky Carmichael’s view of the Civil Rights Era, were above all Supremacist. He hated Western Civilization, which he could stereotype and deride for all he wanted, without bothering to blink or hesitate. The West was all bad, useless, and needed to be destroyed. That Princeton, couldn’t be bothered with having its pupils promote such garbage, is sad -I only hope, they don’t graduate too many Fascists of any and all colors and creeds- that the American people would be willing to put the Future of their nation at stake, on such garbage, is appalling.
38 responses so far
I burst out laughing so loud my cat sprinted away. Where did you find that picture? It is unbelievable how much they do look alike.
Did you know and go looking or did you happen upon it and recognize it immediately?
I hope you don’t mind I am going to try to copy and paste it into a email for all my friends and relatives. And ask them to send it on.
“Politico’s Jim Vandehi Shills for Michelle “Camille” Obama”
http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/
With link to the video….
Michelle Obama and hubby are very hurt and it’s all Hillary Clinton’s fault….No VP for her!!
Now I have finished reading your thoughtful piece and my high regard for your body of work grows.
I love it lol
Funny picture
I actually understand that point of view, from historical and personal experience perspective. She is 100% entitled to it.
What strikes me as INSANE, however, is why would someone with that view of the world want her husband to run for President?! What is the pooint of presiding over those you cannot integrate with?!
What is even more insane is that, with this attitude, he would come this far…
Michelle’s thesis was hardly mentioned when Wright became an issue the first time around but why didn’t the MSM bring up the thesis when Wright became an issue again?
Also, it’s reported that she graduated from Princeton cum laude. Hitchens criticism of her writing skills is pretty much shared all over the internet and her SAT scores were low so what’s the explanation for the honors? Was grade inflation part of the affirmative action program or did she rise to the occasion somewhere between taking the SAT and writing her senior thesis?
@Betty
Actually, I found the picture on Savagepolitics.com. They have a perfect stash! Once I saw it, I knew what I wanted to write on. Thank you for your kind comments… always appreciated!
@moodswinger
My point precisely. Everyone is entitled to believe as they like, hey, Creationism is as Absurd as they get, and Wright is Alright- but not if you’re running for President. It’s not representative of the country, nor of its aspirations.
I tried reading Michelle’s thesis and got as far as page 6. I couldn’t understand how she even got into Princeton with such poor writing skills. Her writing is below Sophmore High School level. And this is written while at least being a Junior at Princeton. These two Obamas are revealing everything that is half-assed in our society. There went the reputations of Harvard Law School and Princeton. That’s okay, I figured they were just hot air for the most part anyway. I’ve watched the idiots who are on the faculty of Harvard Law for awhile. They are some of the worst “thinkers” on the planet. Just read their law review articles… they bitch and moan and weep and cheap shot their colleagues at different schools like they are all out on the dodge-ball field and none of them can throw or catch and they don’t have the good grace to just sit out recreation period– they just have to keep sucking.
Most people write pretty relaxed when they’re blogging. You’re trying to get out ideas, not perfect form. However, in a thesis, you’re actually supposed to at least try to get the language right.
I found her thesis absolutely undecipherable. And stupid. Just the fact that she kept hyphenating “thank you” repeatedly in the introduction pissed me off. And what the hell is “separationism”?
Separatism? Even if you could get the word right, that’s hardly a new concept Michelle. And it didn’t start with Black Liberation Idiotology.
Michelle, if you have any free time, you might want to look at the long
history of separatism. Um– it’s kind of been used against people, ya know? Ya might not want to push that agenda. Ya know, Michelle. Huh?
What I do think is funny… is that if Michelle takes a few more whaps
for being such an ass. And this is picked up (yeah, whatever) by the media… how are they going to play it? I mean, if it isn’t racist… it can’t be classified as sexist can it? Wouldn’t that be great and amazing if the MSM decided that people calling out Michelle was sexist? Do you think two alternate universes would then meet and the “media personalities” would explode on camera? –just hoping.
It’s funny you go on a rant about Michelle Obama’s writing while yours is so poorly constructed.
“And what the hell is “separationism”?” You spend two paragraphs going on and on about separatism. Let’s do some vocabulary — it seems you really need it.
(n) separationism, (advocacy of a policy of strict separation of church and state)
(n) separatism (a social system that provides separate facilities for minority groups)
No wonder Hillary attracts the uneducated. If only you could use a dictionary…
Michelle and her husband have been touted by everyone in mainstream media as elite, accomplished intellectuals. The record reveals the exact opposite yet the myth continues. In order to pull this off in the age of information those behind his campaign must have known that there is enough white guilt and enough angry African Americans in this country to blind those voters to the truth. Meanwhile, Princeton needs to answer for their part in allowing this woman to graduate. I myself was subject to constant criticism from my advisor in graduate school and almost quit because of the pressure(George Mason University, maybe that explains it).
HillDawg, there are different standards of grammar for informal blogs than there are for theses. You would know this if you were truly educated and not just elitist.
P.S. There is a grammar error in your first sentence!
John Edwards, MAJOR Disappointment…NARAL/Obama Doesn’t Surprise Me, A Perfect Fit
http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com/
What must poor Kate Michelman be thinking?
**It’s funny you go on a rant about Michelle Obama’s writing while yours is so poorly constructed.
“And what the hell is “separationism”?” You spend two paragraphs going on and on about separatism. Let’s do some vocabulary — it seems you really need it.
(n) separationism, (advocacy of a policy of strict separation of church and state)
(n) separatism (a social system that provides separate facilities for minority groups)
No wonder Hillary attracts the uneducated. If only you could use a dictionary**
People who use dictionaries are elitists!
Actually, the whole guild by association approach to the candidates wife is really pathetic. I’m not all that interested in Obama’s wife. She seems like a nice enough lady, and she’s a hell of a lot smarter and better educated than McCain’s wife. Not to mention the fact that Michelle had to fight her way up in life. McCain’s wife was born into huge amounts of money - so huge that she won’t release her tax returns.
That’s “guilt by association”.
**Michelle and her husband have been touted by everyone in mainstream media as elite, accomplished intellectuals. The record reveals the exact opposite**
No, anyone who’s looked at Obama closely recognizes that he has a first rate intellect, the equal of the brightest in contemporary US politics.
So your claim is false on it’s face.
It’s just incompetent argumentation to claim that the person applying for the job is not smart because the spouse isn’t brilliant.
Oh no, I’m not claiming that Obama is not smart because he married Michelle(oh wait a minute that could be a valid argument right there). I’m saying that the mere fact that someone can orate and ‘act’ as if he’s smart does not make him so. And no one can look at him closely because everytime someone asks about anything significant he and his staff(who take most of the blame for everything) play the race card(not him, it’s Hillary and Bill race-baiting, not little old me, I’m so above all of that) or they throw that now sickening ‘hope’ and ‘change’ at the blinded, the ‘emperor’s wearing clothes’ masses.
I guess what we’re going to have to put up with next, is how “wise” the gruesome twosome is. Since intelligent is no longer gonna cut it, I guess the MSM and assorted ding-bats who blog are going to have to give a little affirmative action to the Obamas mental capabilities. It’s gonna turn into wisdom. Because wisdom, unlike intellect, cannot be measured. You see Michelle, probably is a genius. And we just can’t grasp that. Oh, thought police, where are you? We need to equate blundering stupidity with brilliance. Can you fix that for us Mr. Axelrod?
The Obamas are a nightmare for America. They put affirmative action to shame. Princeton and Harvard piss out diplomas to put what they think looks good in their quarterly reports. Shame on them.
Beyond all the hideousness, crankiness, skankiness, stupidness and overbloated egoism….why why WHY does Michelle Obama try to look like Jackie O……hair and pearls, dress?
Someone really needs to get a hold of her and give her a make-over.
A pirhana with a flip……it’s all just too much to be born.
The thought of living through that couple for 4 years is a nightmare too hideous to comprehend.
This is about as rough as I’ve gotten on this site so far, but…Illustrator: You’re an idiot. Your racism shines so brightly I can’t see anything else. You are so poisoned against Sen. Obama that even his wife wearing pearls, and the way she does her hair and clothing, are somehow “hideous”??
You all need to find a local KKK and join up. It would be far more honest than your barely-veiled posts on this site.
Sorry my liberal friends, Brack Obama himself doesn´t look that much racist, but his wife is just a sad and pathetic fanatic. For Christs sake, she graduated from Princeton with this crap of thesis ? Im not very smart, but here at utah state , where I study geography, this load of crap would never make even an F. Come on Michelle Obama, cut white people some slacka, just as they did by approving this pathetic thesis of yours.
Adrienne J: hallelujah, you are right on the spot.
Juanita, can you give us an article about Nancy Keenan? Oh please, Juanita…something really on target and with lots and lots of evil in it. An article so satisfying it will make me want to smoke after reading it.
I have, actually, read the entire Michelle Obama thesis. If this lack of depth or quality is acceptable to Princeton, then I’ll have to re-adjust my judgement of their “Ivy League” status. As a retired English teacher, her writing skills are NOT at graduate school level, period. And no, I’m not a racist.
Or is it possible, folks, that Princeton did not fairly apply their standards BECAUSE Michelle was Black?
If that’s the case, then Michelle Obama gained her Master’s Degree in Sociology through social promotion.
Due respect.
I agree, Michelle´s thesis is of very low quality, not to mention for Princeton. She basically got into Princeton because of her race. Now, she should really reflect on this and stop the racist witch hunt she has pursued all her life. Putting aside Barack Obama, Michelle would be a terrible First lady, she is full of hate, a very much unjustified hate. Of course African Americans deserve a chance, as all Americans do, but not at the expense of pure and simple mediocrity.
Thank you, Richard.
Frankly, there are MANY Americans who will have a problem with a First Lady who allowed her daughters to sit in the pews of a hateful pastor like Jeremiah Wright and “learn” Christian principles from a man who humps the podium while screaming “Clinton was RIDING US DIRTY.”
It isn’t about Wright’s First Amendment rights. They exist.
It’s about the lack of judgement by those lovely daughters’ MOTHER in allowing this nonsense to be what they heard and were taught about the message of Jesus.
And frankly, there are a lot of African Americans who feel the same way I do.
It’s not about race. It’s about teaching children HATRED of others they do not even know.
That wasn’t the message of Jesus at all.
While I do appreciate what I call “spunk” in young girls and grown women, what Michelle Obama represents is something completely different, and there will be many Americans turned off by same, including me.
Common decency is common decency, no matter WHAT color your skin is.
That’s what my non-racist white grandmother taught me, and it seems, what Obama’s white grandmother tried to teach him, too, even if he DID throw her under the bus to save his own political butt.
Have a nice day, all.
Amen
Perhaps Michelle Obama should reflect upon this: the United States has millions of white people, descendants of European migrants ( such as italians, Irish, Scots, etc) who arrived to America during the late 19th and early 20th century, who never owned slaves, never profited from slavery, and therefore have no moral or ethical debt with African Americans, beyond the debt any human being should have with another: lawful citizenship. When Michelle pours out her hateful poison on white people, she talks as if our granpas were wealthy landowners that exploited Africans. when the truth is that my great grandpa was a bloody farmer in Ireland who lived in very poor conditions ( almost all his brothers died of physical hunger), perhaps even worse than those experienced by Michelle’s grandpa. Many of our ancestors also had tough times, and damn hell nobody has given me an undeserved free ticket to Princeton for it .So cut the Racist crap Lady Piranha !!!
Mary:
Hmm. I can’t believe you actually mentioned Jesus on here, because I pretty much assumed everyone here was atheist. If you have ANY respect for the message of Jesus, than you might want to take a step back and reflect on your views. Wasn’t it Jesus who said, “Let the one who is without sin throw the first stone”? And correct me if I’m wrong, but Jesus’ primary message was love, acceptance, turn the other cheek, don’t judge, etc etc etc.
If there are any true Christians on this site, you may take a look at whether your views/actions are in line with your beliefs. There is quite a bit of hate ’round these parts, and that is definitely not the quality of Christianity.
Nice speech, Brent.
Maybe you want to give that speech to Michelle Obama and her pastor Jeremiah Wright.
Does the phrase “riding us dirty” come from the Bible, dear?
Ephesians? Galations? Acts? Revelations?
Email Michelle Obama and ask her yourself.
Or her daughters. Apparently they’ve been taught that “riding us dirty” is quite ok coming from their pastor.
Will we have sermons like this in the White House?
Well, Jesus did say, before you try to remove the speck from another’s eye, first remove the plank from your own. I suppose you’re a perfect person with no problems of your own, right?
“First remove the plank from your own.”
Yes, I think Michelle and Jeremiah should follow that.
Any mother who allowed her children to sit and listen to that pastor scream “Riding us dirty” while humping the pulpit is not fit to be First Lady, period.
And whether you want to play word games on an obscure messag board, you’ll find that the majority of the American people feel the same way in November.
I get to choose who is worthy of my vote, period.
Fine. Just stop pretending to be a Christian, or acting like you know anything about “the message of Jesus”.
Yes, I feel compassion for Michelle, that being said: I don´t want her as first lady, nor his husband as President. I don´t want an inspired blood-thirsty Ahmadinejad laying his fanatic paws on Israel, while Mr and Ms Obama torch up the U.S with their race rethoric.
First off,I found this blog through a link from Free Republic.I am a conservative,so I do not have a candidate in this presidential election.However,I live in Illinois and know more about Obamalamadingdong than I really want to.He ran for the House against Bobby Rush,a former Black Panther-got his clock cleaned because he wasn’t “black” enough.That was when he felt he needed some street cred,so he adopted the Black Liberation Theology teachings of J.Wright.As to the piranha,LOVE IT!! Contrast this snarling,anti-white racist with the beauty and grace of our current First Lady.Be afraid-be very afraid.Pistol Pete
[…] she the Creature doing the rounds on your behalf in South Carolina! Wasn’t she the one assuring the world you […]
I am afraid! Israel, the land of our lord is afraid!
Well said, Richard.
Michelle wants to take her kids to a pastor who humps the pulpit and screams “Riding us dirty,” fine.
But I don’t want her as my First Lady, and her airhead bamboozling husband will NEVER get my vote.
EVER.
[…] is still a member of this Church of Hatred, and promises to continue being a member. Clearly, Michelle Piranha loves it. The couple insists on taking their kids there. Excrement0 has already smeared the […]
[…] about as convincing as the logic and flunecy of her Princeton (that’s right, that place) thesis. Hey, if she wants to be ignored, she could just shut […]